<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Content Unblock</title><description></description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>9</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-5619273041605744464</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-04-06T15:48:45.656-07:00</atom:updated><title>Post Election Sopa Planned</title><description>With the bill stop online privacy act practically killed for the short term many are&amp;nbsp;wondering&amp;nbsp;if its really dead. The former United States&amp;nbsp;Connecticut&amp;nbsp;Senator turned&amp;nbsp;lobbyist&amp;nbsp;for the Motion Picture Association of America has made it clear in a recent interview with The Hollywood Reporter they&amp;nbsp;intend&amp;nbsp;to strike back after the election.&lt;br /&gt;The interview went on to talk about needing to literally merge Hollywood with Silicon Valley. Dodd wen't on to rave about how he wished Steve Jobs was still alive to help with the piracy issue. But if you look back 10 years ago into history at how closely Apple responded with Itunes and the Recording Industry Association of America responded you will notice the differences and similarties. Now compare that to what Chris Dodd and the&amp;nbsp;Motion&amp;nbsp;Picture Association of America are pushing for through the Stop Online Privacy Act you will notice many differences and similarities. Yes the MPAA and RIAA both want to pass large internet control bills into government for quite a long time now. But how Steve Jobs&amp;nbsp;handled&amp;nbsp;it was completely different the began sellings&amp;nbsp;iPod's&amp;nbsp;and offered paid online 99 cent song downloads. Steve Jobs took the music industry from compact disc to making a profit selling mp3s in the 21st century. Now with internet boxes like Boxee, Roku, Apple TV, and Google TV many think this should be the Motion Picture Association of Americas entry into the 21st century and not another attempt at SOPA.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-5619273041605744464?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2012/04/post-election-sopa-planned.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-1481287409855174923</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-18T00:15:31.306-08:00</atom:updated><title>Missori Unblock LGBT</title><description>A federal judge told Camdenton Missori School Disctrict that it could not filter the lesbian, gay, transgender educational websites. The&amp;nbsp;ACLU&amp;nbsp;took up the issue over a basis of religous values to the lgbt community stating the school district was discriminating. This move is a little bit of an interesting switch because normally schools filter this content. And any school district that&amp;nbsp;receives&amp;nbsp;funding for internet services from federal government is supposed to protect&amp;nbsp;children&amp;nbsp;such obscene content. But because the websites that promote the lgbt community are&amp;nbsp;supposedly&amp;nbsp;more related to religon somehow then sexuality.&lt;br /&gt;District court gave the school district 30 days to follow through with the court order and the school is considering its options. For the school receiving this rulling and having to balance filtering requirements for federal funding can be very tricky. Technology filters customizations are never perfect and this will be for sure a hard to implement to keep the court and federal law happy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-1481287409855174923?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2012/02/missori-unblock-lgbt.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-6170740475013032533</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-18T12:43:12.536-08:00</atom:updated><title>India Internet Censorship</title><description>&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;The clock is now ticking for India and her citizens. The Indian government wants to start censorship on facebook as early as this July 2012. Some people say well thats ok I don't use facebook so that won't bother me. But the truth of the matter is internet censorship and filtering pushes are like domino’s. Once one leg of the table starts to crumble the government will go after other websites. And many might say well thats ok I use Google Plus now instead of Facebook. But once Google Plus is gone were are you going to go after that. The push for SOPA and PIPA in the United States coupled with this new censorship push in India makes it harder to find safe anonymous services in a good country as well.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-6170740475013032533?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2012/01/india-internet-censorship.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-5284999907573977484</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-09T06:04:16.707-08:00</atom:updated><title>Woman Sues Over Library Internet Policy</title><description>&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;The library in the town of Salem, Missouri is being sued over internet policies of content blocking. Anaka Hunter along with the American Civil Liberties Union are taking the library board and city of Salem to court. Anaka was trying to view blocked content pertaining to American Indian religious content but has been unsuccessful she claims to getting the library to unblock the religious content. Although by federal law libraries that receive federal funding are required to block adult content they are not required to filter out other internet content in other categories. The internet filtering system complaint includes a bias into blocking only certain religious web pages on popular websites like wikipedia that are generally considered an online encyclopedia. The interesting point in the complaint is that certain parts of wikipedia are claimed to be blocked while leaving mainstream religions unblocked. Wikipedia is meant to be a free resource online encyclopedia that would generally suite a library atmosphere for its educational value.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-5284999907573977484?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2012/01/woman-sues-over-library-internet-policy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-8939735591511367837</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-28T17:01:13.340-08:00</atom:updated><title>Yahoo Sued Over Copyright Claim</title><description>A major news paper in Singapore has filed copyright claims against popular internet site Yahoo. The newspaper Singapore Press Holdings claims that Yahoo has reproduced many parts of articles from various newspapers owned by the southeast Asia press company. When running one of the mentioned websites&amp;nbsp;stomp.com.sg through Copy Scape (copyscape.com) we did not find any duplicate content on the internet at first. Later clicking on an option on Copy Scape to search through the sites Ask&amp;nbsp;Libby&amp;nbsp;section many results from all over the web returned many results but still no content from a Yahoo website. Copyright violations are becoming a more and more serious threat in many major governments around the world as they ramp up censorship through legislation and&amp;nbsp;policies&amp;nbsp;like Sopa and The Ip Protect Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg did offer an RSS feed for&amp;nbsp;aggregation&amp;nbsp;on there site by the way but the articles in the RSS feed are not the entire stories. Aggregation is one of the common ways news websites like Yahoo and Google News get there news articles and contents from internet blogs. But scraping and reproducing the entire story on Yahoo's website while not having the&amp;nbsp;license&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;reproduce the entire stories is usually a clear cut case as long as evidence of content reproduction is given in court. If this happens to you and your website ends up getting ripped make sure to take several screen shots of the content on your website and the copyright infringers website. Screen shots are key and essential in a court case like this as a web service like Yahoo may try and take the evidence down to cover there tracks.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-8939735591511367837?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2011/12/yahoo-sued-over-copyright-claim.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-8086362063810824485</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-25T23:36:37.335-08:00</atom:updated><title>Unblocking The Pirate Bay</title><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;b id="internal-source-marker_0.8170998832210898"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"&gt;Many countries including many European countries have recently over the past couple years past laws and created policy's to block such torrent sites like The Pirate Bay. Many of the blocking techniques included dns level blocking and even some entire ip address blocks. In efforts to unblock these torrent websites internet user communities are creating browser add-ons and techniques to fight back. The group MAFIAAFire recently created a tool that redirects you to a different domain name when the domain name is blocked for the torrent website. ThePirateBay Dancing! is an add-on from MAFIAAFire one of there latest and most sophisticated internet browsers add-ons for Mozilla Firefox that uses advanced random proxy technology. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-8086362063810824485?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2011/12/unblocking-pirate-bay.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-8564612657844218430</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-20T00:38:07.963-08:00</atom:updated><title>UK Blocks Newzbin</title><description>&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;Several internet service providers in the United Kingdom have received letters asking them to block access to Newzbin. If you are not familiar with Newzbin it is a British Usenet service used to index Usenet content. The controversy started after efforts by Hollywood companies like Fox, Universal, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Disney, and Columbia began to push for legal action in spring of 2010 in British Courts. The website itself hosts torrent files much like the Pirate Bay which aren't the actually illegal files themselves but contain information on how to find the network seeding the illegal file. As blocks go into place users begin moving onto other methods like bit torrent proxies, vpn servers, and encryption standards. Many rights group argue although over 90 percent of the content on these index servers is clearly illegal and copyrighted the courts orders just force users underground into newer more decentralized methods. And rights groups claim that there is almost no affect on the users downloading illegal content that it just takes away rights from normal internet users and pushes more control into government on shutting down internet services. No alternative has yet to be proposed from rights groups except to ignore the courts request. We should note that the website newzbin.com and thepiratebay.com are both hosted physically in the country of Sweden where a British court has no jurisdiction in pulling the plug. Also the information available did not say if the movie companies attempted to contact websites directly as that would be one of the best solutions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-8564612657844218430?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2011/12/uk-blocks-newzbin.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-826545610429829310</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-17T19:59:09.070-08:00</atom:updated><title>Sri Lanka Mirror Site Partially Unblocked</title><description>&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;The country of Sri Lanka a large island just off the southern tip of India has agreed to allow the website Sri Lanka Mirror to be the first website of five to be unblocked by the country’s internet service providers. The website came back into compliance with government rules late Thursday after removing links to already blocked websites in the country. The ruling to allow the website back online came through an agreement reached in Sri Lanka Supreme Court.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;Beyond just linking to websites back in November the Sri Lanka Mirror (srilankamirror.com) four other websites including www.lankaenews.com, srilankaguardian.com, paparacigossip9.com, and www.lankawaynews.com were blocked by the government media minister. The websites were charged with character assassination and violating individual privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;Sri Lanka itself has had a long history of internet and other media in general censorship. Not to mention the amount of government control involved regulating content providers. It should be noted that the country requires registration of your website with the government if you want to run one in the country. Reporters without borders organization also has the country listed on a listed on its list of countries that monitor there citizens online in some form. Sri Lanka dropped off the lists in 2010 but was re-added just this year to this lists.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-826545610429829310?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2011/12/sri-lanka-mirror-site-partially.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3769362336334608496.post-3164149367651365197</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-13T22:50:37.240-08:00</atom:updated><title>Social Media Unblock BlackBerry</title><description>&lt;div style="margin-bottom: 0in;"&gt;New development for the BlackBerry has lead to the ability for a special content filtering solution for the phone. The app will allow access to many popular features and functions of websites and apps like twitter and facebook. While being able to use the content filter to block pages and other parts of social media services like facebook. Research in Motion the main developers of the BlackBerry worked with a Canadian company named Ufone. Now the test is to see whether or not countries and localities like Pakistan will accept the new content filtering technology for social media sites on smart phones and other devices. A courts ruling in Pakistan was the main driver behind the need for specific content filtering on smart phones. Without many of these social media websites unblocked partially demand for services would have dropped significantly leaving many companies with a loss in revenue.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3769362336334608496-3164149367651365197?l=www.contentunblock.info' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.contentunblock.info/2011/12/social-media-unblock-blackberry.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>
